Question
Posted by Tim at 23:14:23

Why do we talk about “thunder and lightning” when lightning comes before thunder? Shouldn’t we instead talk of “lightning and thunder”? We don’t want to put the cart before the horse, after all.




Article Path: Home: Miscellaneous: Question


Trackback URL: http://asisaid.com/journal/trackback/1334.html

Re: Question

Given that they occur at the same time, it doesn’t matter how you say it. The reason you hear the thunder later then you see the lightning comes down to light traveling (186,000mi/sec) alot faster then the sound does.

If you’ve ever been right under a thunderstorm you’d see and hear little to no delay at all.


Posted by Mark - Feb 5, 2008 | 6:1:12



Re: Question

We do it because in the German language, whence we get the expression, saying thunder first rolls off the tongue nicely: donner und blitzen.


Posted by Ed Hurst - Feb 5, 2008 | 6:20:16



Re: Question

Mark: true, true, but that’s no fun!

Ed: Wow, huh! And hail storms are known as Rudolph?


Posted by Timothy R. Butler - Feb 6, 2008 | 23:31:12



Re: Question

Smart aleck!

Hail storm is hagel-schauer (pronounced "hoggle shower"). While the words "hagel" and "hail", or "thunder" and "donner", are clearly similar in germanic phonemes, we never adopted the "blitzen."


Posted by Ed Hurst - Feb 7, 2008 | 8:5:45


Please enter your comment entry below. Press 'Preview' to see how it will look.

Name:
Location:
Homepage:
E-mail:
Subject:
:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:
Remember my information
1